So the political tug of
war for show off of the higher gdp numbers has begun. People posed their faith
in this new government to deliver the promises. But seems like after the 100
days government has not stopped boasting big numbers and lines.
This time around the
government has found an alternative to mystify the public by overhauling the
methodology itself. Looks like the dismal industry numbers have forced to do
something out of the box.
but let me demystify
you. the boasting that by increasing the inclusive basket and increasing the production
function itself will bolster the gdp numbers by 2-3% is a bit kite flying in
the air.
The changing of the
production basket and changing the base year is routine exercise carried
usually in the gap of 5 years. Long time has passed when the production basket
was increased. Probably in 1999-2000.
Also to point out that
with no increase in real production output numbers, even if you manage to
increase gsp numbers by changing the base year and production basket, this
increase will only be once. After that falling to original growth rate number
will be the reality and policy makers will get confused and even confused will
be the public and opposition who claimed initially for the increased numbers
will be harsh on the new government on the decreased numbers and will make them
responsible.
So to make free boasting
and rhetorics about increasing numbers will only put the country in fogs. One more
thing about this government is the habit of doling out incomplete information
about the policy matters. Nothing has been said about the details of the
programme.
The important thing to
be taken out from this episode are few questions. The first is the exactitude
of the numbers which are gathered. First look at the precision of the numbers
that the capacity offers let alone trying to cover the full baskets which is
near impossible. Is the infrastructure adequate currently or more is required.
an interesting comparision between india and china shows that india has about
one third of that of Chinese data collectors. The width and diversity of the
datas remaining same the stark contrast in the numbers shows the lack which
should be corrected first. The real problem lies with the informal sector, its
true. and specially among it the small scale manufacturing and the micro
manufacturing enterprises. There are about 4.1 crore of small scale manufacturing
enterprises. Out of it only 3 lakh are registered. Implies less than 1% of the
entities are known to us fully, other are only haywire.
Another problem is which
data to rely upon for the policy formulation. Every other data collected by
different entity and organization are different and some even differ vastly. The
states are accused of inflating gdp numbers to show off their work beyond
capacity and potential. These discrepancies are to be corrected first rather than
make people believe on weak foundations.
The problems are basic
yet again. Only correctness is required which is not an easy task per se. we
are a poor developing country, and we have a much robust data enumerators with
us. We are better than most of the developing counterparts, also considering
the sheer amount of data we collect. But only praising outr efforts for the
natural blessing or this curse is not the solution. We have huge hopes for our
nation, with the government and with ourselves as well. Let us not belie
ourselves.
No comments:
Post a Comment